Sports & Games

Correct answer: .

The Springfield YMCA's building superintendent handed Naismith two old peach baskets from a storeroom, and Naismith tacked them to the lower rail of the gym's balcony at each end of the court, about ten feet off the floor -- a height that stuck and is still used in basketball today. The first game was played on 21 December 1891 with a soccer ball, and because the baskets still had their bottoms intact, someone had to fetch the ball out by hand (or with a long pole) after every single score, until an open-bottomed net design was introduced years later. The option about apple crates plays on the same peach-orchard imagery but describes the wrong container entirely -- no such crates were involved. The option about borrowed metal hoops is wrong because standardised metal rims and backboards weren't adopted until basketball had already been played for years, not on day one. The option about rope-wrapped barrel hoops sounds like a plausible improvisation but has no basis in the actual, well-documented account of that first gym class.

Source: Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame, 'The Birthplace of Basketball'; Britannica: 'basketball' (history)

Correct answer: .

Morgan blended elements of basketball, tennis, and handball into a gentler net game for older YMCA members and first named it 'Mintonette,' a name meant to evoke badminton's light, net-and-volley feel. Watching an early demonstration, fellow instructor Dr. Alfred Halstead pointed out that the whole point of the game was to volley the ball back and forth without letting it touch the floor, and suggested the more descriptive name 'volleyball' -- which was adopted almost immediately and has stuck ever since. The option naming 'netball' is wrong because that's a genuinely different sport, developed in England around the same era out of women's basketball, with its own separate history. 'Battledore' is wrong because that's the old name for the racket-and-shuttlecock pastime that badminton itself descended from, not Morgan's invention. 'Fistball' (also called Faustball) is a real, much older net sport from continental Europe played by striking the ball with the fist, unrelated to Morgan's game despite the superficial net-sport resemblance.

Source: International Volleyball Hall of Fame, 'William G. Morgan'; FIVB (Fédération Internationale de Volleyball), 'History of Volleyball'

Correct answer: .

For the 1908 London Games, organisers routed the marathon to start on the East Terrace at Windsor Castle -- close enough that the royal family could watch from a nursery window -- and to finish at the stadium's normal track finish line, directly in front of the royal box, which happened to add up to 26 miles and 385 yards. That course became so closely associated with the event that it was later adopted worldwide as the official marathon distance in 1921, even though earlier Olympic marathons (1896 through 1906) had each used a noticeably different length. The option about measuring the ancient Marathon-to-Athens route is a common myth: the legendary run behind the event's name was roughly 25 miles by a completely different, unrelated estimate, and had no bearing on how organisers laid out the 1908 course. The option about a runners' vote is invented; no such vote is recorded anywhere. The option about dividing evenly into stadium laps is wrong both because the marathon was run mostly on roads with only a short final stretch on the track, and because 26 miles 385 yards doesn't divide evenly into a standard track lap anyway.

Source: World Athletics, 'Queen Elizabeth marks 1908 London Olympics and centenary of classic marathon distance'; International Olympic Committee (IOC) Games archive, London 1908

Correct answer: .

'Duck' is simply a shortening of the older phrase 'duck's egg,' recorded in print as early as 1863: scorers and journalists noticed that the oval shape of a duck's egg looked like the numeral zero written on a scorecard, the same visual logic behind American sports calling a zero score a 'goose egg,' and behind tennis using 'love' for zero. One of the earliest known uses reported the future King Edward VII being dismissed without scoring in 1866, noting he had 'retired to the royal pavilion on a duck's egg.' The option about a bad-luck superstition invents a folklore explanation that has no basis in the documented history -- the term is purely about the shape of a number, not any belief about the bird itself. The option describing a bowling delivery nickname confuses a batting term with an unrelated idea; no such delivery name exists. The acronym explanation is a false etymology invented well after the fact -- the phrase 'duck's egg' was already in common use decades before any such abbreviation could have been coined.

Source: Oxford English Dictionary, s.v. 'duck'; International Cricket Council (ICC) laws and terminology reference

Correct answer: .

In Persian, 'shah' means king and 'mat' is an adjective meaning 'at a loss,' 'stuck,' or 'helpless' -- so shah mat literally described the king's stuck, helpless position on the board, not his death. As the phrase passed through Arabic and then into medieval French and English, 'mat' got reinterpreted along the way, as if it meant 'dead,' which is exactly how the popular but linguistically inaccurate idea that checkmate means 'the king is dead' took hold and spread. The option claiming the king 'surrenders his crown' is invented and has no connection to the actual Persian words. The option claiming the king 'has fallen in battle' is deliberately the tempting one here, since it's essentially the widespread mistranslation described above dressed up in different words -- convincing precisely because so many people already believe it, but not what the original phrase literally says. The option about 'the final square' is unrelated nonsense with no basis in the word's history.

Source: Oxford English Dictionary, s.v. 'checkmate'; Britannica: 'chess' (history and terminology)

Correct answer: .

The London toy and games maker Jaques first sold the game commercially under the invented name 'Gossima' in the 1890s, using cork balls and vellum-covered bats. Once a new hollow celluloid ball came into use around 1900, producing a distinctive 'ping' and 'pong' sound on contact, the company rebranded and trademarked the game as 'Ping-Pong' in 1901, later selling the American rights to Parker Brothers, who defended that trademark just as aggressively. When the International Table Tennis Federation formed in 1926, it deliberately chose the generic name 'table tennis' specifically to avoid any trademark dispute over 'Ping-Pong.' The option pairing 'Whiff-Whaff' with 'Bat-Ball' is wrong because 'Whiff-Whaff' was only ever one of several informal nicknames people used casually, never an actual company's marketed brand name, and 'Bat-Ball' was never a real product name at all. Reversing the order to 'Ping-Pong' then 'Gossima' inverts the real chronology. 'Parlour Tennis' and 'Flick' are invented names with no historical record behind them.

Source: International Table Tennis Federation (ITTF), history of the sport; Britannica: 'table tennis'

Correct answer: .

The story of Webb Ellis picking up the ball wasn't even investigated until the 1890s, when the Old Rugbeian Society looked into it -- decades after Webb Ellis himself died in 1872. No diary entry, letter, or newspaper report from 1823 has ever been found describing the incident, and the identity of the person supposedly on hand to witness it was never firmly established, so the entire tale rests on testimony gathered long after the fact rather than on any contemporary evidence. World Rugby still honours the legend by naming the Rugby World Cup trophy after him, while acknowledging historians regard it as unproven. The option claiming he was at a different school is wrong -- it's well established that he genuinely attended Rugby School at the relevant time, so that part of the story isn't in dispute. The option about unwritten rules is a distractor mixing a separate, true detail (early football rules of that era generally were informal and unwritten) with a false claim about what actually undermines the legend. The option describing contemporary kicking-only match reports is invented outright: there are no contemporary 1823 match reports of any kind, which is precisely the historians' point -- describing what such nonexistent reports supposedly said would itself be manufacturing evidence that doesn't exist.

Source: World Rugby Museum, 'William Webb Ellis: What We Know'; Britannica: 'rugby football' (history)

Correct answer: .

British army officers stationed in the city of Pune, then anglicised as 'Poona,' added a net to the older bat-and-shuttlecock game battledore-and-shuttlecock sometime in the mid-1800s, and an informal set of rules for this new net version was first written down there around 1867. The game only picked up the name 'badminton' after it reached England: in 1873 the Duke of Beaufort showed it to guests at his country estate, Badminton House in Gloucestershire, and the estate's name attached itself to the sport, while the original nickname 'Poona' faded from use outside India. The options naming Egypt, South Africa, and Malta each pair a real place with an invented local nickname -- none of these locations or names appear anywhere in badminton's actual documented history, which is specifically and firmly tied to British officers in colonial India.

Source: Badminton World Federation (BWF), history of the sport; Britannica: 'badminton'

Correct answer: .

At the Atlantic City Country Club in 1899, golfer Ab Smith's approach shot came to rest about six inches from the cup, and he reportedly exclaimed, 'that was a bird of a shot' -- 'bird' being ordinary American slang of the period for anything excellent. His playing group then proposed that a hole played one stroke under par deserved double the usual side-bet, informally naming the achievement a 'birdie,' and the term spread from that round into the sport's standard vocabulary worldwide, eventually inspiring 'eagle' and 'albatross' as playful extensions of the same bird theme for even better scores. The other three options all reuse the same bird imagery convincingly, which is exactly why they're tempting, but none of them is the actual phrase recorded in the historical account -- the documented quote is specifically about the shot itself being a 'bird,' not a comment about only a bird being capable of it, and not a dismissive 'for the birds' remark, which in ordinary English usually means the opposite of excellent.

Source: United States Golf Association (USGA), 'FAQ: Golf History Questions'; Britannica: 'golf' (terminology)

Correct answer: .

Coubertin himself explained in August 1913 that the six colours together -- blue, yellow, black, green, and red, plus the white background -- reproduced the colours of every nation's flag without exception at that time, making the design a genuine symbol of universal inclusion rather than a simple stand-in for the five continents. A popular but mistaken idea holds that each individual ring's colour maps directly onto one specific continent; Coubertin's own explanation was about the whole six-colour combination covering every flag, not about assigning any single colour to any single continent. The option about silk-printing limitations invents a technical reason with no basis in Coubertin's actual stated purpose. The option about five founding IOC nations is wrong on the numbers alone: fourteen nations sent athletes to the first modern Games in 1896, far more than five, and the rings are explicitly tied to the five inhabited continents united by the Olympic movement, not to a specific count of founding member states. The option about matching 1896 sports is invented and factually odd, since considerably more than five sports were contested at those first Games.

Source: International Olympic Committee (IOC), 'Olympic rings: Symbol of the Olympic Movement' and '1913: First public presentation of the Five Rings Symbol'

Correct answer: .

The term traces to 1858, when bowler H. H. Stephenson took three wickets in three consecutive deliveries; appreciative spectators held a collection and used the money to buy him a hat on the spot, and the practice of gifting a hat for the feat continued into the 1860s. The word 'trick' was added later, comparing the feat to a magician pulling something remarkable out of a hat, and the compound word 'hat-trick' first appeared in print in 1878. The option about the captain giving up his own cap invents a different, more ceremonial gesture that isn't what the historical record describes -- it was paying spectators, not the captain, who funded the hat. The option about mounting the ball inside a hat in the pavilion mixes up two separate cricket traditions (keeping a special ball as a memento, and the hat-trick custom) into one invented ritual. The option claiming 'hat' was only added later because it rhymed with 'bat' gets the sequence backwards: the literal hat came first, in 1858, and the word 'hat-trick' was coined afterward to describe the feat, not the other way around.

Source: Wikipedia, 'Hat-trick (cricket)' (summarising Chelmsford Chronicle and cricket history records); Cricket Country, 'Hat-trick -- the origins of the term'

Correct answer: .

In the late 1800s, students at English public schools and Oxford University had a habit of clipping a word down and tacking on a jokey '-er' ending -- 'football' became 'footer' in 1863, breakfast became 'brekker', and rugby football became 'rugger'. Association football, which had been formally named to distinguish it from rugby football, got shortened to 'assoc' and then given the same '-er' treatment, producing 'socca' by 1889 and 'soccer' by 1895. The option about a stuffed sock is a tempting false link because 'sock' and 'soccer' sound alike, but no historical source connects the word to sock-based balls. The option crediting a German tour invents a borrowing that never happened -- 'soccer' is a purely English slang coinage, not a loanword. The option crediting the Football Association with officially inventing 'soccer' gets the source wrong: the FA's own formal name was 'Association Football'; 'soccer' arose separately as informal student slang for that name, never as an official term the FA itself created.

Source: Etymonline, 'soccer'; Oxford "-er" (student slang), summarised via Wikipedia

Correct answer: .

In boxing's earliest bare-knuckle era, fights were held inside a rough circle scratched or drawn on the ground, with spectators themselves forming a circular 'ring' around the fighters. The 1743 London Prize Ring Rules kept a small circle at the centre of the fighting area, but by 1838 the Pugilistic Society had introduced a square enclosure bound by ropes -- easier to build than a true circle -- and the old name 'ring' simply carried over onto the new square shape, which is why boxing writers still sometimes call it the 'squared circle.' The option linking 'ring' to a bell invents a connection between two different words that happen to share a sound in English but have no historical link in this case. The option claiming a circular arena survived into the television era gets the timeline backwards -- the square shape was already standard by the mid-1800s, long before broadcast cameras existed. The option about boxers 'ringing' an opponent's ears is a plausible-sounding pun, but no etymological source traces the arena's name to that punch-related phrase.

Source: World Boxing Association, 'Why the "Ring" Is Called a Ring'; Wikipedia, 'Boxing ring' (London Prize Ring Rules, Pugilistic Society)

Correct answer: .

The Jules Rimet Trophy was stolen on 20 March 1966 from a stamp exhibition at Westminster's Central Hall, where it was on public display ahead of that year's World Cup in England. A week later, on 27 March, a Londoner named David Corbett was walking his dog Pickles in south-east London when Pickles began sniffing at a wrapped parcel under a hedge; Corbett opened it, spotted the winners' names engraved on the trophy, and realised what he'd found. Pickles became a minor celebrity afterwards, receiving an award from a canine charity and fan mail from across the country. The option about a ransom note and storage unit invents a police-led recovery that never happened -- the actual convicted thief was caught separately, and the trophy itself was found by chance, not through negotiation. The option about a security guard finding it in a false wall places the discovery back inside a building, when it was actually found outdoors under a hedge. The option about an anonymous mail return contradicts the well-documented dog-and-hedge discovery entirely.

Source: Wikipedia, '1966 theft of the Jules Rimet Trophy' and 'Pickles (dog)'

Correct answer: .

Before seeding existed, tournament draws were made at random, which meant two of the best players could easily be paired against each other in an early round, robbing the later rounds of their biggest matches. Organisers began deliberately spacing the strongest entrants apart through the draw, describing this the same way a farmer scatters seeds evenly across a field rather than dropping them all in one clump, so each 'seed' has room to grow without crowding out the others. The earliest known print reference to this use of 'seed' appears in Spalding's Lawn Tennis Annual in 1900, and exactly who first coined the term is not recorded. The option about a 'seeded seat' invents a completely different meaning tied to physical seating rather than draw placement. The option naming a 1920s official called 'Seed' invents a person; no such individual appears in any tennis history record. The option about a printed symbol on draw sheets invents a visual explanation where the real origin is a spacing metaphor, not a printed icon.

Source: Wikipedia, 'Seeding (sports)'; Grammarphobia Blog, 'Seed catalog' (citing Spalding's Lawn Tennis Annual, 1900, and OED)

Correct answer: .

Herodotus, writing closest in time to the events, describes Pheidippides making an entirely different journey: a roughly 140-mile run from Athens to Sparta before the battle, asking the Spartans for military help against the Persians. Herodotus never mentions any runner carrying victory news from the battlefield at Marathon to Athens afterward. A later writer, Plutarch, records a version closer to the popular tale, but names the runner Eukles rather than Pheidippides, and even that account describes exhaustion rather than an instant death. The dramatic combined story -- Pheidippides running from Marathon to Athens, crying 'we conquer', and dying on arrival -- doesn't appear until the British poet Robert Browning wrote it in the 19th century, more than two thousand years after the battle. The option about the distance being exaggerated invents a detail no source supports; the actual modern race distance was fixed for reasons unrelated to this legend. The option about archaeology relocating the battle site is fabricated -- the battle's location near the town of Marathon is not in dispute. The option about the 1896 Olympics gets the timeline wrong: Browning's poem, which is the true source of the popular legend, predates that Olympics by decades.

Source: National Geographic, 'Who invented the marathon? It's not as ancient as you think'; Bad Ancient, 'Did Pheidippides invent the marathon?' (citing Herodotus and Plutarch)

Correct answer: .

The Derby Stakes was a single, specific horse race founded in 1780 by Edward Smith-Stanley, the 12th Earl of Derby, and first run at Epsom the same year. As the race grew into one of the most eagerly anticipated sporting events in England, its excitement and prestige led people to borrow the name 'derby' for other big, closely contested sporting occasions, and the word eventually settled into its modern meaning: a match between two rival local teams, especially in football and rugby. The option about a boxing championship in the town of Derby invents an event that isn't documented in any sporting history source. The option about a rowing race judged by 'Lord Derby' invents both the event and a misleading title, since the real Earl of Derby founded a horse race, not a rowing contest, and wasn't a judge of anything ongoing. The option crediting the Football Association with officially coining the term gets the origin backwards: 'derby' entered football as informal borrowed slang from horse racing, not as an FA-issued label.

Source: LALIGA, 'The origin of the word "derby"'; Wikipedia, 'Derby (horse race)' and 'Epsom Derby'

Correct answer: .

Before 1764, the Old Course at St Andrews had 12 physical holes, but golfers played ten of them twice in a single round, making 22 stretches of play in total. In 1764, the golfers there decided that some of the holes were too short and combined the first four into two, which trimmed a round down to 18 stretches of play. Other Scottish and, later, international courses gradually copied St Andrews's layout out of respect for its status as golf's home course, and the number was formally written into the rules by the R&A in 1858, well before it became the worldwide standard in the early 1900s. The option about a 1920s standardising committee invents a formal vote that never took place; the number spread through imitation, not regulation, decades earlier. The option about natural sand dunes invents a geographic coincidence with no basis in golf history. The option linking the number to croquet timing invents a connection between two different sports that have no documented historical relationship of this kind.

Source: Scottish Golf History, '18 Hole Round'; LiveAbout, 'Blame It On St. Andrews: Why Golf Courses Have 18 Holes'

Correct answer: .

On 29 August 1882, Australia beat England at the Oval in London for the first time on English soil, a result seen as a devastating upset. The Sporting Times responded with a satirical mock obituary, written by Reginald Shirley Brooks, declaring that English cricket had died and stating that 'the body will be cremated and the ashes taken to Australia.' The following English tour of Australia was then jokingly framed as a quest to reclaim those 'ashes', and a small terracotta urn -- traditionally said to contain the burnt remains of a cricket bail or a lady's veil -- was later presented to the English captain as a gift, becoming the symbolic trophy still associated with the series today. The option describing a cartoon invents a visual joke where the real origin was a written obituary. The option about mailed bonfire ashes invents a literal, physical prank rather than the figurative newspaper joke that actually started the tradition. The option crediting a later radio commentator misdates the origin by decades and describes an unrelated 'gone up in smoke' phrase.

Source: Wikipedia, 'The Ashes' and 'The Ashes urn'; Google Arts & Culture, 'The History of the Ashes'

Correct answer: .

The word traces back to the Old English noun 'innung', meaning 'a taking in' or 'a putting in', itself built from the verb 'innian' ('to go in, bring in') plus the ending '-ung' (the ancestor of modern '-ing'). By the 1730s, English sports writing had adapted this into 'innings' as a term for a team's turn at bat, and the earliest known cricket match to be described this way was played at Blackheath in 1730. Cricket carried the word forward essentially unchanged, using 'innings' for both one turn and several turns alike. Baseball, developing later out of related English bat-and-ball games, split off a distinct singular form, 'inning', reserving 'innings' only for the plural, giving the two sports their different-looking but common-root vocabulary. The option about an 1840s American simplification invents a specific date and deliberate decision that no etymological source records. The option about an Old French card-game term invents a completely unrelated origin story; the real root is Old English, not French. The option about an umpire's 'in-going' phrase invents a plausible-sounding but undocumented shortcut, when the actual word already existed as a single noun centuries before organised umpiring.

Source: Etymonline, 'inning'; Wikipedia, 'Innings' (citing recorded 1730 Blackheath cricket match)

Correct answer: .

The golfer who completed the sweep was Bobby Jones, who in 1930 won all four major championships of his era in a single calendar year -- the U.S. Open, the (British) Open Championship, and the U.S. and British Amateur Championships. Atlanta Journal sportswriter O.B. Keeler reached for the card-game term 'grand slam', meaning to win every trick in a hand, to capture the scale of the sweep, years before tennis or baseball borrowed the same phrase for their own full sweeps. Walter Hagen was a dominant golfer of the same decade, famous for his match-play wins and showmanship, but he never completed a single-season sweep of the four majors. Gene Sarazen is remembered for being the first golfer to win all four modern major championships over the course of his career, which is a genuinely impressive and often-confused-for-this feat, but it happened across many years, not in one season. Francis Ouimet is a legendary name in golf history for his stunning win as an amateur at the 1913 U.S. Open, an entirely different achievement from the 1930 sweep this question asks about.

Source: Wikipedia, 'Grand Slam (golf)'; American Heritage, 'The Impregnable Quadrilateral'

Correct answer: .

The word 'golf' (then spelled 'gouf') appears in a Scottish Act of Parliament as early as 1457, which banned the game because it was distracting men from archery practice -- centuries before acronym-coining, the trick of building a new word from a phrase's first letters (the way 'scuba' or 'radar' were later built), became a common way languages formed words. Because that naming trick simply didn't exist yet when 'golf' was first written down, the G.O.L.F. story can only be a much later invention projected backward onto an old word; researchers tracing its appearances in print have found the 'Gentlemen Only, Ladies Forbidden' phrase showing up only since the 1990s. The leading real explanation traces 'golf' to an older Scots or Dutch word for a club or stick used to strike something, though scholars still aren't fully certain of the exact root. The option about a rival four-letter acronym invents a document that doesn't exist -- there's no earlier acronym on record for the popular version to have replaced. The option claiming the 1457 law spells out the acronym is false; that law is a short, plainly worded ban on playing 'golf' and other games, with no acronym anywhere in its text. The option about caddies and a dictionary-confirmed joke misstates the real research: no dictionary confirms the acronym at all, as a joke or otherwise.

Source: Online Etymology Dictionary (etymonline), 'golf'; Barry Popik, 'Gentlemen Only, Ladies Forbidden ("golf" backronym)'

Correct answer: .

'Shuttle' traces back to a Germanic root meaning 'to shoot' or 'to project', and it was already in everyday use for the weaver's tool -- the device that carries thread rapidly back and forth across the other threads held on a loom -- centuries before badminton existed as a game. The sport's feathered projectile earned the name 'shuttlecock' because it moves exactly like that: shot back and forth repeatedly between two players, never settling, the same way a weaver's shuttle darts across a loom. That same back-and-forth image later got reused for shuttle buses, shuttle diplomacy, and the Space Shuttle, all describing something that travels repeatedly between two fixed points. The option about an inventor surnamed Shuttle invents a person and a patent that no badminton history records. The option about a sailing message-boat invents an unrelated maritime meaning that no dictionary attaches to the word. The option linking 'shuttle' to shooting an arrow confuses two different things: the underlying root does relate to swift projection in general, but no source ties the documented word specifically to archery -- its earliest recorded use was in weaving, not bow-and-arrow sport.

Source: Online Etymology Dictionary (etymonline), 'shuttle' and 'shuttlecock'

Correct answer: .

'Trophy' descends from the Greek word tropaion, built on tropē, meaning 'a turning' or 'a rout' -- specifically the moment an enemy line broke and turned to flee. Victorious Greek armies marked that exact spot by setting up a makeshift frame hung with weapons, shields, and armour stripped from the defeated side, dedicating the display to a god such as Zeus or Athena. The Romans adopted the word as tropaeum, it passed into English through French by the 1510s, and only centuries later did its meaning stretch to cover the cups, medals, and statues awarded for non-military contests today. The option about a foot-race midpoint invents a meaning with no connection to the word's documented military origin. The option about a ceremonial handshake invents a ritual that appears nowhere in the word's history. The option about a single decisive wrestling hold is a tempting near-miss because it borrows the idea of a 'turning point' in a contest, but it misapplies that idea to one sporting move rather than to the literal turning and flight of a defeated army, which is what the word actually marks.

Source: Online Etymology Dictionary (etymonline), 'trophy'; Dictionary.com, 'trophy'

Correct answer: .

The word began as the Middle English 'noumpere' (from an Old French term built from 'non' plus 'per', literally 'not equal' -- describing a neutral third party brought in to settle a dispute between two equally matched sides). Around 1400, listeners hearing the phrase 'a noumpere' started to mishear the word boundary, shifting the leading 'n' onto the article instead, so 'a noumpere' gradually turned into 'an oumpere' and then 'an umpire'. Linguists call this kind of boundary-shift metanalysis, and the same thing happened to other English words in the same direction: 'a napron' became 'an apron', and 'a nadder' became 'an adder'. The option about a dictionary editor deliberately simplifying the spelling invents a specific historical actor with no documented role in the word's history. The option crediting cricket clubs with a nickname gets the direction backwards -- 'umpire' was already the standard spelling centuries before organised cricket existed, so clubs couldn't have shortened it into that form. The option claiming a separate French word genuinely started with 'u' invents a second word that no dictionary records; every documented ancestor of 'umpire' begins with 'n'.

Source: Online Etymology Dictionary (etymonline), 'umpire'; The Saturday Evening Post, 'In a Word: The Long-Suffering Umpire'